Vahid Panahi; javad vahedizadeh
Abstract
The present article is entitled "The views of Sheikh Ansari and Akhund Khorasani on the word "la" in the rule of the prohibition of detriment " which examines the opinions of these ...
Read More
The present article is entitled "The views of Sheikh Ansari and Akhund Khorasani on the word "la" in the rule of the prohibition of detriment " which examines the opinions of these two thinkers about the rule of rule of the prohibition of detriment and their interpretation of the word "la". Here, an attempt has been made to answer the questions raised by Sheikh Ansari and Akhund Khorasani about the explanation of the rule of the prohibition of detriment. For this purpose, the jurisprudential and principled works of Sheikh Ansari and Akhund Khorasani and their opinions have been taken into consideration. At first, the concepts and definition of rule of the prohibition of detriment have been examined with emphasis on the approach of Sheikh ansari and Akhund Khorasani. Then, the views of Sheikh Ansari and Akhund about the word "la" at the beginning of the rule of the prohibition of detriment are discussed and their similarities and differences are stated. Finally, by proving the superiority and superiority of Sheikh Ansari's point of view over the akhunds point of view, the perception and scope of the application of the Harm Rule has been examined and criticized from the perspective of Sheikh Azam and the akhund. In short, this research explained the views and opinions of Sheikh Ansari and Akhund Khorasani about the rule of the prohibition of detriment and the interpretation of the word "la" and reviewed and criticized them.
